(*) Knocking the cell phone out of that young woman's hands during a beer run
(*) Drooling on Neko Case
(*) The "mustard" incident
(*) Climbing Joe Cocker
|
|
|
|
* Let's Not Be Fools!
* Let's not be naive.
* Let's not be greedy
* Let's not be afraid to roll our eyes just a little.
* Let's not be unfair.
* Let's not be afraid to tap into that inner reserve of wonder that's known as imagination.
* Ok, let's not be premature with our celebrations!
* Let's not be fussed about appearing as if we are creating conflict to get universal health care, renewable energy, a Global Marshall Plan.
* Let's not be lonely, let's not be strangers. Let's wake up on the same side of the bed today.
* Let's not be afraid of political action.
* Let's not be hasty here, I'm sure there's a perfectly rational reason for this.
* Let's not be distracted by a few wheelbarrows full of cash.
* But let's not be a people who are known for what and who we're against.
* Let's not be timid.
* Let's not be ignorant on the subject.
* Let's not be ridiculous.
* Let's not be too quick to praise Tim Hortons' show of leadership regarding the recycling of paper coffee cups.
* Let's not be too hard on the boy. He's been bowling fantastically well for the last year.
* Let's not be as intolerant as those we criticize! [
* Let's not be too harsh on Cory.
* Let's not be imitations or fakes- we just need to keep it real.
* But while we are at it, let's not follow our pets back into the wild – let's not be like Timothy Treadwell in Grizzly Man
* Let's not be too hard on Courtney Lee.
* But let's not be so sure there isnt a backup plan yet.
* LET'S NOT BE IMPOLITE AND CHASE HER AWAY.
* Let's not be so quick to chase Mora out.
* Let's not be so quick to crown Roger the Greatest
* Let's not be anti-intellectual (Jesus and Paul were not).
* We all love to stick it to the corporate Man, but let's not be too hasty or judgmental.
* So let's not be lame about it, there are some things you should know.
* Let's not be so hard on her. ...
* But let's not be any more anthropocentric.
Here is the latest roundup of research towards the revolutionary new dating paradigm.
Rating attractiveness: Study finds consensus among men, not women
From a press release about an article in the June issue of the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology:
Men's judgments of women's attractiveness were based primarily around physical features and they rated highly those who looked thin and seductive. Most of the men in the study also rated photographs of women who looked confident as more attractive.
As a group, the women rating men showed some preference for thin, muscular subjects, but disagreed on how attractive many men in the study were. Some women gave high attractiveness ratings to the men other women said were not attractive at all.
The age of the participants also played a role in attractiveness ratings. Older participants were more likely to find people attractive if they were smiling.
But an abstract for the same paper says:
Participants of both genders showed substantial consensus in judgments of whom they found attractive and unattractive, although men showed higher consensus than women.What does this mean for the RNDP: If you're a man and a male friend tells you should meet someone because they are hot, you should. If you are a woman and a female friend tells you to meet someone because they are hot, probably you should. But maybe not.
Talk to the Right Ear
In 3 different studies, researchers from the University "Gabriele d'Annunzio" in Chieti, Italy determined a marked preference to listen with the right ear by young people in noisy nightclubs. Perhaps their most significant finding:
...the researchers intentionally addressed 176 clubbers in either their right or their left ear when asking for a cigarette. They obtained significantly more cigarettes when they spoke to the clubbers' right ear compared with their left.
What does this mean for the RNDP:
Single women gaze longer
A study by Indiana University neuroscientist Heather Rupp found that a woman's partner status influenced her interest in the opposite sex.
...women both with and without sexual partners showed little difference in their subjective ratings of photos of men when considering such measures as masculinity and attractiveness. However, the women who did not have sexual partners spent more time evaluating photos of men, demonstrating a greater interest in the photos. No such difference was found between men who had sexual partners and those who did not.
What does this mean for the RNDP: Guys: the length of time a woman spends looking at you might tell you that she is available, but not necessarily available to you. She might only be taking the time to decide what she thinks about you. Gals: you're still stuck with no useful way to tell if that guy looking at you is married or not.
Daily sex helps to reduce sperm DNA damage and improve fertility
New research suggests that in couples trying to have babies, in order to improve sperm quality, men should not hold off until ovulation day, but should ejaculate at least daily for the prior week. Dr David Greening, an obstetrician and gynaecologist in Wollongong, Australia, says:
The optimal number of days of ejaculation might be more or less than seven days, but a week appears manageable and favourable. It seems safe to conclude that couples with relatively normal semen parameters should have sex daily for up to a week before the ovulation date. In the context of assisted reproduction, this simple treatment may assist in improving sperm quality and ultimately achieving a pregnancy.
What does this mean for the RNDP: Okay, this isn't about dating. But it does illustrate that the research community has scientists conducting research and reporting findings that may not please everyone, but will make the world a better place.